In our first essay on Sacred Music we looked at chant and discussed some of the properties which make it uniquely appropriate for the liturgy. In our second essay we looked at one short section of the liturgy and examined its treatment by various composers. Now I would like to look at some of the choices a composer has when setting a text. In articulating and observing them it is my hope we will then be able to appreciate when composers make (and do not make) excellent and novel use of the resources at their disposal.
–
1. Declamation vs. Development
In setting a section of the mass a composer must choose whether he wishes merely to decorate the text or to develop the idea, that is, he must decide whether he will simply mention the idea or whether he will attempt to explore its meaning or describe. We might find a few examples to define the spectrum of choices. On the extreme of one side would be mere declamation, i.e., pronunciation of the text. Opposite might be a fugue, a dense development of the idea. In between might be plainchant, the use of sequence and repetition, and imitation.
The texts of the mass, both ordinary and proper, provide various opportunities for the composer. Clearly some ideas seem suited to one type of treatment. For example, "Kyrie eleison," "cum Sancto Spiritu," and "Osanna" have traditionally been treated fugally and this seems both appropriate and acceptable. Why? First, they occur either at the beginning or the end of a section of the mass and a large fugal section is more suited as an introduction or conclusion than a middle. Second, the ideas are short and self contained and thus they are appropriate candidates for fugue subjects.
Please let me note it is not my intent to map out the mass and suggest how each section ought to be set, but rather point out that the composer must first make certain considerations and then choose a course of action. The mass of course presents challenge and opportunity for composers, the greatest of whom have responded with genius. No theoretician could have predicated Bach's setting of the Crucifixus, which Forkel, Bach's first biographer, called a "crown of thorns." My reason in articulating these points is to suggest that good liturgical music will attempt to address them. Likewise when a piece fails to address these problems it will be seen to be proportionately lacking in affect.
2. Strophic vs. Through-Composed
A composer would then have to consider how he wishes to divide the text, if at all. For example, will it be
- Through-composed, i.e. with unique music for each line but with little or no repetitions and doubling back.
- Broken up by line or phrase as seems appropriate to the composer
- Treated strophically, with each line or stanza set to the same music.
Again, certain parts of the mass lend themselves to certain treatments. For example, one can compare Palestrina's through-composed setting of the Gloria in his Missa Papae Marcelli to Bach's setting in the B-minor Mass in which Bach carefully sets particular phrases to particular music. Likewise one might compare the traditional setting of the Dies Irae sequence which is strophic to Mozart's setting in his Requiem in which he groups the stanzas and then sets them.
3. Soloists vs. Choral
An individual in an audience or congregation will invariably perceive a relationship between himself and a solo singer as different from one between himself and a choir. If a soloist sings "adoramus te" or "miserere nobis" it seems as if he is speaking on behalf of the congregation. If a choir sings them it seems as if the choir asks as an extension of the congregation. Looking at the Dies Irae sequence is instructive here also. If a soloist sings "Mors stupebit" we empathize with him as a fellow man looking at death and the effect is dramatic. If a choir sings these words the result is more descriptive and we are more affected by the sight than any personal situation. The composer must then, if he uses soloists, be aware of this difference.
4. Time
While the issue of the passing of time does not so much affect music for the liturgy as other non-liturgical sacred music such as oratorio we ought briefly touch on the matter. In principle we may say that in an aria time seems to be still as the music explores a given moment whereas recitative and drama push the action forward. Much like the difference between a fugue which explores a particular idea and chant which declaims it, the aria describes or explores the present emotion or situation whereas the drama or recitative conveys action. A fine example of this contrast are the contrasting and adjacent pieces from Part II of Handel's Messiah. Time seems to stop in the aria "Thou art gone up on high" as the soloist repeats and reflects on the idea. In contrast, the subsequent music for chorus conveys action: The Lord gave the word. Superficially the pieces might not seem different, but how much more reflective and personal (and longer) is the aria than the choral piece? How much more emotional and suited toward sudden flights of feeling?
5. Detail, Structure
Lastly we must note that detail must be contextualized within a large-scale structure to be understood. Only if we know the language and rules of the composer and the direction of the piece can the composer convey a sense of departure, significant action, and return. This requires attention to structure within and among movements, that is, attention to and consistency in the:
- passage of keys within movements
- tonic keys of each movement
- thematic material if it is repeated
- instrumentation
- setting of music for soloist or choir
- meter and tempo
- four points mentioned above
- use of parallelism
–
In setting the mass a composer will make these choices whether consciously or not. If he is not conscious of the possibilites it is hard to imagine, even if the music is competently written, that it will suit the text or that there will be any unity of affect.
Next time we will look at a famous setting of a mass and see whether its composer paid attention to these five aspects.
Next time we will look at a famous setting of a mass and see whether its composer paid attention to these five aspects.
I look forward to your analysis. A compare/contrast between Bach's B minor and Beethoven's Missa Solemnis would highlight a lot of these points I'm guessing.
ReplyDeletePS Welcome back.
I agree with Tom: that would be fascinating reading! Broadening the analysis further would be even better: a Gregorian mass, a polyphonic mass, a Baroque mass, and a Classical/early Romantic era Mass (either the Missa Solemnis or one of Haydn's late Masses). You could even add a Bruckner Mass as an example of a late Romantic specimen. But such an analysis would swell to huge proportions. It would, however, be a valuable contribution to sacred music criticism.
ReplyDeleteHello Tom! A pleasure to hear from you as usual and I'm sorry I was absent so long. I'm hoping to be back to normal posting since other matters have settled down.
ReplyDeleteI too think your idea is right and after some thought I really do think Bach is probably the place to start. You know this started with last year's "Thanksgiving" list and now it's a full blown project. It always starts with a list! But this is an exciting project. Thanks for the ideas!